Programme
>Miniforums
I, II
>Learning
workshops
>Action
workshops
>Speakers
![]()

Preparatory
course
Academic
summit
Cluster
study visits
![]()
Conference
Service: Kongresspecialisten
phone: +46 90 15 49 25
e-mail: tci@kongress.com
Publisher: David Nordfors, VINNOVA
BUILDING SOCIAL CAPITAL AND TRUST AND CIVIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP
| Facilitator: | Björn Terje Asheim, University of Lund, Sweden, University of Oslo, Norway
|
|
| Introduction: | David
Wolfe, University of Toronto, Canada
|
|
Documentation:
|
Lars Coenen, Lund University | |
Abstract/Key issues: Understanding innovation as interactive learning implies that cooperation is necessary in making firms and regions competitive. Building social capital is a key instrument in promoting cooperation within firms, in network of firms and in regions. Social capital can be rooted in civicness as well as be a result of organisational and institutional innovations, the latter being most relevant in this context, as it can be build, while the former type only can be build on. (Bjorn Terje Asheim) The dynamic of institutional relationships underlying more cooperative
forms of governance requires a greater capacity for social capital
and trust among a wide range of social and economic actors within
the region, including erstwhile competitors. Social capital refers
to various features of the social organization of a region, such as
the presence of shared norms and values that facilitate coordination
and cooperation among The concepts of social capital and trust as outlined above may help us understand why certain kinds of economic activity tend to cluster despite the opposing trend towards dispersal brought on by the spread of globalization. Social capital becomes progressively more valuable as the process of globalization continues; it is not equally available in all communities; it cannot be purchased or transferred; and it is difficult to imitate or replicate. Trust, as a component of social capital, helps overcome market failures or reduce the level of market costs for firms in densely related networks, by supporting stable and reciprocal exchange relationships among them. Partners involved in these relationships establish a willingness to exchange information on something more stable and enduring than a barter basis. Both sides of the relationship can benefit from lower costs and improved quality in the knowledge thus attained. As these relations grow and develop, a larger component of the knowledge shared and transmitted becomes tacit, rather than explicit with a concomitant increase in the level of understanding gained through the exchange. Ultimately, the relationships can be extended to include other partners of the respective firms, further enhancing the extent and the value of the network. (David Wolfe)
|
||